The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: Staghorn Versus Nonstaghorn Stones

摘要

Purpose: The study compared characteristics and outcomes in patients with staghorn or nonstaghorn stones who were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) within the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) PCNL Global Study.\udPatients and Methods: Data over a 1-year period from consecutively treated patients from 96 centers worldwide\udwere collated. The following variables in patients with staghorn or nonstaghorn stones were compared: National prevalence, patient characteristics, access method, puncture frequency and outcomes, including bleeding rates,\udoperative time, and duration of hospital stay.\udResults: Data from 5335 eligible patients were collated; 1466 (27.5%) with staghorn and 3869 (72.5%) with\udnonstaghorn stones. Staghorn stone presentation varied between centers from 67% in Thailand to 13% in\udArgentina. The frequencies of previous procedures were similar between groups, but shockwave lithotripsy was\udless frequent in patients with staghorn stones compared with nonstaghorn (16.8% vs 22.6%) and positive preoperative\udurine cultures were more frequent in patients with staghorn than nonstaghorn stones (23.4% vs 13.1%).\udPatients with staghorn stones underwent multiple punctures more frequently than those with nonstaghorn stones (16.9% vs 5.0%). Postoperative fever, bleeding, and the need for blood transfusion were more frequent, the median operative time and duration of hospital stay were longer, while the proportion of patients remaining stone free was lower (56.9% vs 82.5%) in patients with staghorn than nonstaghorn stones.\udConclusions: The proportion of patients with staghorn stones varies widely between centers. Stone-free rates\udwere lower, complications more frequent, and operative time and hospital stay were longer in patients with staghorn stones.